EN
Language · same page NLNederlands/ai-en-automatisatie/ai-pareto-analist-skill-voor-claude/ ENEnglish (UK)/en/ai-and-automation/ai-pareto-analyst-skill-for-claude/ ESEspañolnot translated yet We do not remember your choice and never redirect you automatically.
~/skills/ai-pareto-analyst[ok] loaded
INS.SKILL · FREE FOR CLAUDE, AND FOR CODEX AND CURSOR TOO

The AI Pareto Analyst skill for Claude

You paste a list into Claude, with customers, tasks, products or cost items and a figure per line, and you get back where the result actually comes from. Not as a vague 80/20 platitude, but calculated: the real ratio, a split into three groups, and per group an action you can take on Monday. The 80/20 rule is deliberately not assumed to be true here. It works out whether yours is 70/30, 90/10 or 95/5, and states alongside it what it could not see.

Download the skill View all 100 skills NL 4.3 KB · zip containing SKILL.md · MIT licence · no account needed
$ installation, line by lineFIG.00
~/.claude/skills
theseo ~ %
  inflating: ai-pareto-analist/SKILL.md
theseo ~ %
  ---
  name: ai-pareto-analist
  description: Past het Pareto principe (80/20) toe op elke vorm van data, lijsten, kla…
theseo ~ %
[ok] skill active · 1,533 words of instruction loaded

the lines above come from the zip on this page · SKILL.md is 9,460 bytes

~/skills/ai-pareto-analyst/01-demonstration[run]
Section 01 · The demonstration

List in, ratio out

reg. P.001

This is the worked example that sits in the SKILL.md itself, shown here in shortened form: twelve customers with their annual revenue, marked A to L in the file. Watch what happens to the classic 80/20. It does not take that ratio on trust, it works it out, and arrives at something else.

FIG.01: From customer list to three groups[#---] sheet 1/4
~/analyses · claude + ai-pareto-analyst
you > here are my 12 customers from 2025 with their revenue, where should I focus?
customers.txtpasted from your admin A: 18,000 · B: 12,000 · C: 9,000 · D: 8,500 · E: 4,200 · F: 3,800 · G: 3,200 · H: 2,800 · I: 2,400 · J: 1,800 · K: 1,200 · L: 800
claude · analysis following the five phases...
[1/5]sort and calculate · list from high to low, total €67,700, percentage per customer and cumulative up to 80 per cent
[2/5]real ratio · 4 customers (33 per cent) deliver 70 per cent of revenue: slightly flatter than the classic 80/20, and it is named as such
[3/5]three groups · vital top (4 customers, 70 per cent), middle band (4 customers, 21 per cent), tail (4 customers, 9 per cent)
[4/5]action per group · literally what you do on Monday, no advice in general terms
[5/5]pitfalls · this is revenue and not margin, and it is a single year: both named in the output
analysis.mdshortened, the full example sits in the skill Real ratio: 4 customers (33 per cent) deliver 70 per cent of your revenue. Your spread is slightly better than average, but your top is clear. Vital top (A, B, C, D): call these four for a review conversation and ask what they need that you are not yet delivering. Tail (I, J, K, L): work out your hours and raise the rate to your minimum, or part ways cleanly. Customer L (€800 a year) is almost certainly loss making. Sharpest observation: customer A is a single point of failure, 27 per cent of your revenue hangs on one name. Build a retention plan for this one customer. What I could not see: how many hours each customer costs, the margin after direct costs, and who brings in referrals.
[#####] 5/5 done · the ratio is calculated, not assumed
5P.01 · phases in the fixed procedure
3P.02 · groups in every analysis
3P.03 · pitfalls it checks itself
0P.04 · euros, MIT licence, no account
P.01 to P.04 · properties of the skill file, not results or usage figures.
$ cat 01-wat-de-skill-is.md
DOC.01

What the AI Pareto Analyst is

The AI Pareto Analyst is a free skill from our skill library, which now numbers 100 skills. A skill is an instruction file, SKILL.md, that gives an AI assistant a fixed way of working for one task. Not software you install, no subscription, no link to your bookkeeping: a single text file of 1,554 words that tells Claude how to split a list according to the Pareto principle, what information it needs first, in which five phases it calculates, and which pitfalls it must name out loud along the way.

You download the zip at the top of this page, put it in your Claude environment, and from that moment Claude analyses every list according to this logic. What a skill actually is and how that file format works, you can read in what Claude skills are NL.

You will probably recognise the problem this skill solves straight away. You have too many customers, projects or tasks to do them all justice, and you have long suspected that a handful of them deliver most of the value. But you do not have it in black and white, so you keep doing everything by half. The frontmatter of the file is written for exactly that feeling: the skill does not just trigger on the word Pareto or 80/20 analysis, but also on phrases like where should I focus, where am I losing time, I am short on time, too many customers not enough margin, I want to cut back, and what is my 20 per cent. Anyone who says something like that to Claude while the skill is loaded gets the analysis automatically.

It is written for business owners and teams who feel overwhelmed by too many projects, customers, tasks or products and want to know what genuinely has impact. It is part of the library we make freely available from the AI and automation service, with no account and no sales email afterwards.

One thing you should know up front: the skill calculates with whatever you supply. Measure only revenue, and you get a revenue analysis, and the file itself warns about that: a customer can deliver a lot of revenue and still be loss making because it costs even more time. That is why every analysis closes with the questions that still need data, rather than with a conclusion that sounds more certain than the figures allow.

$ cat 02-het-principe.md # Pareto 1896, Juran 1951, Koch 1997
DOC.02

The Pareto principle: a pattern, not a law

The SKILL.md opens with the history of the principle, and it is not there for decoration: it determines how the skill calculates. Vilfredo Pareto described in his Cours d'économie politique from 1896 that eighty per cent of the land in Italy was in the hands of twenty per cent of the population, and saw the same pattern recur in harvests and in the distribution of income. Joseph M. Juran made the pattern universally applicable: in his Quality Control Handbook he called it the vital few and trivial many and applied it to quality problems, defects and causes. And Richard Koch popularised it in 1997 with The 80/20 Principle for business and personal productivity.

The core the skill takes from that is stated literally in the file: it is not a law, it is a pattern. The ratio can just as easily be 70/30, 90/10 or 95/5. The core idea stays that most of the impact comes from a minority of the input, but which minority and how much impact differs per list. That is why phase two of the procedure is a mandatory calculation step: determine the real ratio, and note it in the output instead of the default 80/20.

That sounds like a detail, but it is the difference between an analysis and a slogan on a tile. In diff form:

The source list in the file counts five titles: Pareto (Cours d'économie politique, 1896), Juran (Quality Control Handbook, 1951), Koch (The 80/20 Principle, 1997), Hennessey (Pareto's Principle in Business Management, 1972) and Kahneman (Thinking Fast and Slow, 2011). The last one is not there by accident: Kahneman is the source for the survivorship bias warning that the skill carries into every analysis. Want to learn to set up a well founded instruction file like this yourself? The approach sits in writing a SKILL.md NL.

~/skills/ai-pareto-analyst/02-the-distribution[ok]
Section 02 · The distribution

Twelve customers, three groups

reg. P.002

The same twelve customers from FIG.01, now as a distribution. The figures come from the example in the skill file, they are not customer data. What stands out: the bars of the tail combined are smaller than customer A's bar alone. That kind of visibility is exactly what the skill was built for.

FIG.02: The distribution of €67,700 across twelve customers[##--] sheet 2/4
A18,000
B12,000
C9,000
D8,500
this is where the vital top ends: 4 of 12 customers, 70 per cent of revenue
E4,200
F3,800
G3,200
H2,800
I2,400
J1,800
K1,200
L800
70%vital top · 4 customers · this is where you double down
21%middle band · 4 customers · optimise or leave as is
9%tail · 4 customers · cut or raise the rate
# bar length relative to customer A · figures from the example in the SKILL.md, not customer data
$ less ai-pareto-analist/SKILL.md # 1,554 words of instruction
DOC.03

What is actually in the SKILL.md

A skill is only as good as its instructions, so we simply describe them here. The file opens with a frontmatter that states when Claude should pick up the skill, and that trigger list is notably broad: from the literal terms Pareto and 80/20 analysis to sighs like what delivers the most, which customers matter most, where does my revenue really sit, and bring focus. The licence is also stated: MIT, version 1.0.0.

Before anything gets calculated, the skill checks whether it has three things: the list itself, the value or metric per item, and what result you consider it to be. That last point is subtle but important: revenue is a different result from profit, and time freed up is a different result from customers won. If one of the three is missing, it asks for it in at most two short sentences before carrying on. So you do not get a form, at most a targeted question.

Next comes the core: a fixed procedure of five phases, and the file states explicitly that no phase gets skipped. Phase one: sort the list from high to low and calculate the total, the percentage per item and the cumulative point at which eighty per cent of the value is reached. Phase two: determine the real ratio, because Pareto is not a law, and note the actual ratio in the output. Phase three: split the list into three groups rather than two, the vital top, the middle band and the tail. Phase four: give a concrete action per group, literally what you do on Monday. Phase five: check the three pitfalls, survivorship bias, too short a measurement period and hidden costs.

The output is also fixed. Every analysis comes back in the same structure: what I analysed, the real ratio, the three groups each with an action for Monday, three sharp observations the user probably did not see, the pitfalls at play here, and to close, the heading what I could not see, with two to four questions that still need data. Those last two headings make the difference between an answer and an analysis: the skill does not just tell you what it sees, but also what it cannot see.

The file closes with four style rules that shape the character of the output. Never write that it is just 80/20, but calculate the real ratio. Concrete figures over ranges whenever there is something specific to say. Never give an action that depends on more information, but ask for that information first. And the word interesting is banned: every observation must be something a business owner can use without further explanation. How those rules play out in the conversation, you can see below in FIG.03.

~/skills/ai-pareto-analyst/03-refusals[ok]
Section 03 · The limits

What the skill refuses

reg. P.003

The SKILL.md contains four style rules and three pitfall checks, and together they matter at least as much as the calculation. A Pareto analysis that is written up too easily gives you just enough confidence to let go of the wrong customer. The rules play out like this: every line is a request you might make, with the response the skill gives according to its own instructions.

FIG.03: refusals.log[###-] sheet 3/4
refusals.log4 style rules and 3 pitfalls from the SKILL.md
just say it is basically 80/20, everyone knows that oneREFUSEDNever write that it is just 80/20. The skill calculates the real ratio and puts it in the output, even if it turns out to be 95/5 or 60/40. In the example it comes out at 33 to 70, and it is named as such.
a rough estimate is fine, just give me a rangeREFUSEDConcrete figures over ranges. If there is something specific to say, the skill says it specifically. Ranges are for situations where the data genuinely allows no more.
give me the advice already, I will send the figures over laterREFUSEDNo action that depends on more information. If the list, the metric or the result definition is missing, the skill asks for it first, in at most two short sentences. Data first, then advice.
what an interesting split, right?STRUCK OUTThe word interesting is banned. Every observation must be something a business owner can use without further explanation. An observation that only intrigues asks nothing of you and changes nothing.
just analyse my active customers, the rest is gone anywayCHECKEDPitfall one: survivorship bias. Anyone who only measures current customers misses the ones who left and draws conclusions from a list of survivors. The skill asks whether you are looking at all items or only the active ones.
just take last month's revenue, that is currentCHECKEDPitfall two: short term measurement. An 80/20 over one month can differ from a year. The skill checks whether the measurement period is long enough to build decisions on.
customer A delivers the most, so put everything into customer ACHECKEDPitfall three: hidden costs. An item can deliver a lot of revenue but cost even more time. Where possible the skill factors in the time or effort, and otherwise it states that the analysis rests on revenue and not on margin.
$ unzip ai-pareto-analist-skill-voor-claude.zip -d ~/.claude/skills/
DOC.04

Installing in Claude Code, Claude.ai or Codex

The zip contains one folder, ai-pareto-analyst, with the SKILL.md inside. Installing is simply a matter of putting the file in the right place, and that place differs per environment. SKILL.md has been an open standard since December 2025, so the same skill also works in Codex, Cursor and Gemini CLI. So you are not downloading a Claude file but a working instruction any modern AI assistant can read.

CLAUDE CODE
  1. Unpack the zip into ~/.claude/skills/ (or .claude/skills/ in your project).
  2. Claude then recognises the skill on its own as soon as you ask about focus or an 80/20 analysis.
  3. You can also call it directly, with /ai-pareto-analist.
CLAUDE.AI
  1. Go to Customize and then Skills.
  2. Upload the zip there as a skill.
  3. Or paste the contents of SKILL.md into the project instructions of a Project.
CODEX
  1. Open AGENTS.md in your repo.
  2. Paste the contents of SKILL.md into it, or put SKILL.md next to it as a separate file and refer to it from AGENTS.md.
  3. Codex reads that along at every session.

After that, using it is simple: paste your list and say what you are measuring. Whatever is missing, it asks for itself. If you get stuck anywhere, the full step by step plan per environment sits in installing Claude skills NL, and the broader explanation of working with AI you will find in the knowledge base.

$ cat 05-wanneer-wel-en-niet.md
DOC.05

When you do and do not use it

It is at its strongest when you have a list that is too long to give everything full attention, with a value per line. Customers with revenue, tasks with hours, products with margin, channels with conversions, cost items with amounts: the file names them all as valid input, and the approach is the same each time. The moment to reach for it is the moment you notice your time, money or energy is spread over too many things and you suspect a handful of them are doing the real work, without having it in black and white.

There are also situations where you are better off leaving it be. A list with no value per item is one: the skill then asks for the metric first, because without a figure there is nothing to sort. A question about the cause of a problem is a second: Pareto tells you where the impact sits, not why. For that question the 5 Whys Analyst was built, which keeps asking until the root of the problem lies exposed. And the most important limit the file names itself in its pitfalls: the analysis is only as good as the measurement period and the metric. One month of revenue says little, and revenue without hours says less than you think.

One more honest limit: the skill makes the choice visible, it does not make it for you. That customer L is almost certainly loss making stands in black and white after the analysis. Whether you part ways, raise the rate or keep them for strategic reasons stays your decision, and the file acknowledges that by asking at the end whether there are items with a value that does not sit in the metric, such as a customer with PR value or a customer who brings in referrals.

~/skills/ai-pareto-analyst/04-upgrade-path[ok]
Section 04 · From skill to employee

Run it yourself or have it run

reg. P.004

This skill is the free do it yourself version of work we also deliver as a service. It stays complete and without any catches, but be clear about what a skill is: it teaches your AI how to do something, while every new session starts empty. It is not the engine and not the memory. You prompt, you supply the list and the context again every time, you check the result. Anyone who wants that differently has two next steps: hand over the engine, or sort out the memory.

$ cat from-skill-to-employee.mdthree steps, same work
upgrade-path.shfree · employee · brain
STEP 1 · FREE
where you are now
The skill: you are the engine You run the AI Pareto Analyst yourself in Claude, Codex or Cursor. Costs nothing, works today, and you keep it entirely in your own hands: no trial period, no locked off parts. The limit is your own time: the analysis only happens when you supply the list and ask the question. $ claude --skill ai-pareto-analyst · €0 · you prompt, you check
STEP 2 · SERVICE
prepared for you
The AI employee: it stands ready without you prompting This exact kind of analysis work, but as a service: the Reporting Employee prepares weekly and monthly reports without you having to sit behind Claude for it, so the question where does my revenue really sit does not keep falling by the wayside every quarter. Control stays with you, because output remains a draft until a human approves it. We deliver this through Mansotti, the company TheSEO is the trading name of, which alongside the Reporting Employee also builds a Quotes Employee and a Sales Employee. Read what an AI employee is and does. from €950 per month · a human approves, always
STEP 3 · BRAIN
everything from one source
Jarvis: all your AIs work from the same company knowledge The skill teaches the AI, the brain is where the memory lives. Want all your AIs to work from the same company knowledge? That is Jarvis, the organisation brain. It connects ChatGPT, Claude, Codex and your people to the same projects, core knowledge and decisions, so your next AI session does not start from scratch. This skill benefits from that too: your customer list, your minimum rate and the conclusions of the previous analysis no longer need to be supplied per conversation. What that delivers in practice, from the plans to your first week, you can read at Jarvis itself. entry plan Brain Start: €9 per month incl. VAT · pay for your brain, not per AI question
# no sales trick: step 1 stays free and complete. The following steps are there for anyone who wants to hand this work off.
~/skills/ai-pareto-analyst/05-jarvis[ok]
Section 05 · The brain

What Jarvis delivers in practice

reg. P.005

Step 3 deserves more than a paragraph, because this is the difference between a smart chat and a system you can build on. Jarvis is the organisation brain: it remembers what your AIs need to know, divides up the work and keeps track of what happened. You notice it first at the start of a new analysis session.

FIG.04: What a session gets back from the brain[####] sheet 4/4
jarvis · organisation brain● sync
$jarvis recall "customer analysis" # schematic example
[core]focus analyses run on margin, not on revenue · measurement period at least a full year
[core]revenue per customer sits in the quarterly export · lost customers count against survivorship bias
[task]pareto analysis customer portfolio Q3 · draft ready · awaiting human approval
[decision]tail customers get a rate proposal first before any parting of ways: recorded after review
[log]previous session: claude calculated the ratio, human adjusted the action list, result saved
[ok]context loaded · this session does not start empty
that is how every task runs through the brain: loggedcontext setdelegatedhuman approvalsaved · the full trail sits at jarvis/how it works NL
context.retained Your next session does not start over Today you explain how your portfolio is put together, and tomorrow a separate chat knows nothing of that any more. With Jarvis every session starts with the same projects, core knowledge and earlier decisions, as in FIG.04: recall first, then calculate.
ai.connected ChatGPT, Claude and Codex, one source Every connected AI works from the same core knowledge and agreements. What you record and approve in one tool, the other uses too. You never explain anything three times and no three separate truths arise side by side.
tasks.tracked Tasks scheduled, tracked, reported done A task gets logged with a goal and a deadline, picked up by the right agent and reported done along with the result. You see at any moment what is running, what is waiting and what is finished.
everything.logged Everything logged and reviewable Every step leaves a traceable record: who asked what, which sources were used, which agent worked on it and who gave approval. Not because it has to, but because otherwise you cannot check what happened on your behalf.
human.approval Nothing goes out without approval AI prepares, a human decides. Output stays a draft until someone approves it, and only approved knowledge goes back into the brain. That line applies everywhere in the system, even for work an agent prepared entirely on its own.
brain.isolated Client brain isolated If you work for several clients, the knowledge per client stays strictly separated. What you learn for one does not leak into the work for another.
# THE HONEST PROOF · NOT A DEMO

We have been running on this system ourselves for months. Every agent session, every task and every decision gets logged in it and can be read back. So a new session does not start blank: it first retrieves the recorded decisions, the running projects and the latest changes, and carries on from where the previous one stopped. Which customers sat in the tail last quarter does not need to go back in every time. We are not describing a promise here but the way of working we ourselves work in every day.

$ cat pricing.mdpay for your brain, not per AI question
Brain Start €9 /month incl. VAT 1 organisation brain · 1 user · 1 AI employee
Brain Solo €29 /month incl. VAT 1 organisation brain · 1 user · 3 AI employees
Brain Team €99 /month incl. VAT 1 organisation brain · 5 users · 10 AI employees
Brain Business €249 /month incl. VAT 3 organisation brains · 20 users · 50 AI employees

See the four plans at jarvis/pricing NL. Through the waiting list NL you only pass on your preferred plan with no obligation. That does not yet create an account, an order or a payment obligation. Business arrangements we discuss first.

~/skills/ai-pareto-analyst/06-related-skills[ok]
Section 06 · The analysis map

The skills around it

reg. P.006

Pareto tells you where the impact sits. What you do next, why it is that way and how you fill the time that frees up: other skills from the same library were built for that.

$ claude --interactief # seven questions, seven answers
DOC.06 · FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What does the AI Pareto Analyst skill cost?

Nothing. The skill is free, falls under the MIT licence, and you do not have to create an account or leave an email address. You download a 4.3 KB zip containing a folder and a single file, SKILL.md, and that is the complete skill. There is no paid version and no sales email follows.

Does this skill also work in Codex, Cursor or Gemini CLI?

Yes. SKILL.md has been an open standard since December 2025, so the same file also works in Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI and other tools that follow the standard. In Codex you unpack the zip into .agents/skills/ in your project, or into ~/.agents/skills/ for all your projects; Codex has supported SKILL.md directly since the open standard of December 2025. Putting the contents of SKILL.md into your AGENTS.md still works too. The instructions themselves are simply readable text, so any AI assistant that accepts instruction files can work with it.

What does the skill need before it starts calculating?

Three things, and that check is stated literally in the file: the list itself, the value or metric per item, and what result you consider it to be. That could be revenue, but also profit, enjoyment, time freed up or customers won. If one of the three is missing, the skill asks for it in at most two short sentences before carrying on. So it never starts calculating on a list where it does not know what the figures mean.

Does the skill always assume exactly 80/20?

No, and that is one of its style rules: it never writes that it is just 80/20, it calculates the real ratio. The Pareto principle is a pattern and not a law, so the outcome can just as easily be 70/30, 90/10 or 95/5. In the example from the file the split turns out to be 33 to 70: four of the twelve customers deliver seventy per cent of revenue.

Why does the skill split the list into three groups and not two?

Because two groups lead to blunt decisions. The skill always makes a vital top you double down on, a middle band you optimise or leave as is, and a tail where you cut or part ways. For every group it gives a concrete action for Monday, no advice in general terms.

Which lists does the skill work for?

For any list with a value per item. The file itself names customers, tasks, products, cost items, channels and time blocks, with metrics such as revenue, margin, hours, conversions or complaints. The skill also triggers without the word Pareto: anyone who says they are short on time, wants to cut back or wants to know where the revenue really sits activates it just as well.

Which pitfalls does the skill guard against itself?

Three, and it names them in every analysis. Survivorship bias: are you looking at all items or only the survivors. Too short a measurement period: a month can give a very different picture from a year. And hidden costs: an item can deliver a lot of revenue but cost even more time. On top of that, every analysis closes with the heading What I could not see, with the questions that still need data.

$ cat 07-en-nu.md
DOC.07

First know where it sits, then grow

A Pareto analysis shows which customers carry your revenue. The next question is where the new enquiries need to come from that grow your vital top. That is where visibility begins: being found by the people looking for you. The free SEO scan shows in a few seconds where your site stands. And if you want to talk further about what else AI can do for your business, from separate skills to full automation, we simply do that in a conversation.

Section 07 · Next stepreachable 24/7
Book a call NL
$ whoami
Gianluca, founder
Written by GianlucaFounder. Has been building visibility for Dutch businesses since 2017, in Google and in AI answers. More about the institute.